Accelerating the onboarding and matching process for enterprise customers

Video overview →
My role
Co-lead
Timeline
3 months
Platform
Web
Company
Torch
01Problem02Research03Approach04Results05Reflections
01
Problem

Employees waited 1–2 weeks to get matched with a coach

Torch is a B2B platform that matches employees with leadership coaches. New coachees were dropped into the product the moment they signed up, with little to no onboarding.

By the numbers
Match profile completion
1–2 weeks
Guidance at signup
No context
Target goal
48 hrs to complete
What did I do

A strategic onboarding flow from selection to matching

01 · Audit

I co-led research across a full 6-month coaching engagement, for coaches and coachees.

02 · Prioritize

My synthesis surfaced product onboarding as the most critical pain point.

03 · Design

With stakeholders, I built a flow explaining why coachees were selected and what to do next.

At a glance
Before
Original Path page with no onboarding guidance

Dropped into ambiguity

Sign up, then land straight on the “Path” page
Navigation options with no guidance
The match profile, the key action, buried in resources
1–2 weeks to complete, if at all
After
New What is Torch Coaching welcome page

Strategic guidance

Sign up, then land on a welcome page
Understand why you were selected and what’s next
Go straight to the match profile, with clear progress
Complete within 48 hours
02
Research

Slow starts undermined Torch’s ROI promise

Torch matched thousands of employees with coaches each year. Delayed launches put ROI and renewals at risk.

The symptom

Coachees took 1–2 weeks to complete their match profile, the action that triggers pairing with a coach.

Leadership impact

“Is Torch fulfilling its core promise to unlock the potential of people, teams, and organizations?” New product leadership saw the problems start at signup.

The key question

How might we accelerate the first critical action and deliver value from day one?

The research

Five critical problems

After reviewing feedback, walking the flows ourselves and synthesizing themes, I presented five problem areas to leadership.

1 · Onboarding (priority)

No guidance for new coachees: the highest-leverage fix.

2 · Scheduling

Opaque and confusing to book sessions.

3 · “Path” structure

Too linear for a flexible coaching journey.

4 · Wayfinding

Inconsistent, so key features were hard to find.

5 · Notifications

Key updates missed; low-priority alerts overwhelmed.

Original Paths screen new coachees landed on
What leadership said
Chief Product Officer: “Where you’re seeing issues follows exactly what I’ve been hearing from customers and customer-facing teams.”
Lead Designer: “I’m seeing the same issues from cohorts in recent survey feedback.”
Decision

With product and design leadership aligned, I was tasked with redesigning onboarding.

How design drives revenue

From customer behavior to business outcome

1 · The behavior that drives results

Completing the match profile within 48 hours of signup.

2 · What stood in the way

Users asking themselves “Why was I selected? Is something wrong with me?” AND “What am I supposed to do? Where do I start?”

Hypothesis

Clarity on why they were selected, plus a direct path to the match profile, will move completion from about a week to 48 hours.

3 · How we’d know
48 hrs to complete match profile
03
Approach

Speed over depth

The constraints
Business
1 month to design, for upcoming cohort launches
Limited engineering capacity
Leadership needed quick wins
Technical
Missing design system components (progress bar, better inputs)
Integration with the matching algorithm
Coordination with email and notifications
What we prioritized
Understanding selection
Completing the profile

Participants valued getting to coaching fast over exhaustive education, and Parkinson’s Law warned that any task inflates to fill the time available. We respected their busiest moment.

What we left out
Coaching methodology: moved to after matching
Feature tours: moved to after onboarding
Customization: cut to the essentials
The design

From strategy to screens

User goals
“Help me understand why I was selected”
“Help me take the first step to get matched”
Business goals
Match profile completion within 48 hours
Faster time to first session
Higher satisfaction at launch
Pain point prioritization matrix
The “What is Torch Coaching” welcome page
Welcome page section explaining why they were selected

Why you were selected

Recognition of potential, not a deficit.

Welcome page section explaining what coaching is

What a coach is

Clearer expectations.

Welcome page section on what to expect from coaching

What to expect

Outcomes, not features.

A streamlined match profile
Match profile as a required onboarding step

Mandatory, not hidden

Moved from path resources into onboarding.

New progress indicator component

Progress indicator

A new component that cuts cognitive load.

The collaboration

Three teams, one goal

Customer success
Refined welcome messaging
Tested comprehension with participants
Iterated on tone and clarity
Product
Revised match profile questions with product and data
Tested usability of the new UI
Validated that progress indicators eased anxiety
Engineering
Built new design system components
Met WCAG 2.1 AA
Kept it responsive on mobile and desktop
Final designs
Step 1
Final What is Torch Coaching welcome page

What is coaching?

Step 2
Final match profile question on desktop

Complete match profile

04
Results

Better first impressions protect lifetime value

Strategic design at a key moment creates measurable business outcomes.

Targeted goals
Less launch anxiety for participants and customer success teams
Better first impressions at a critical moment for customer relationships
Differentiation through faster time to coaching
How it felt, phase by phase

Hover or tap a point to see what coachees thought and felt. Curve heights are a qualitative read of the journey map, not measured scores.

BetterWorseBefore · Day 1: Signup“Why was I selected? Is something wrong with me?”Feels: Anxious, confused, stigmatizedBefore · Days 1–3: Wandering“What am I supposed to do here? I don’t see anything urgent.”Feels: Abandoned, no sense of purposeBefore · Days 4–10: Maybe Discovery“I’ll get to this later, I have work to do.”Feels: Indifferent, low priorityBefore · Days 10–14: Maybe Completion“Oh, there’s a profile thing? I guess I’ll fill this out.”Feels: Uncertain — “is this right?”After · Day 1: Context“Let me see what this is about”Does: Clicks email link, logs inAfter · Day 1: Understanding“Oh — I was selected because of my potential, not a problem”Does: Reads why selected, what to expectAfter · Day 1: Action“I know what to do and why it matters”Does: Starts filling out match profileAfter · Day 1–2: Completion“Almost done — I can see my progress”Does: Submits profile → matched within days
Day 1SignupDay 1Context
Days 1–3WanderingDay 1Understanding
Days 4–10Maybe discoveryDay 1Action
Days 10–14Maybe completionDay 1–2Completion
Before: dropped into ambiguity (1–2 weeks of drift)After: strategic onboarding (completed within 48 hours)
05
Reflections

Respect people’s time at signup

It’s tempting to add onboarding steps that feel valuable, but they don’t always match what people expect. Parkinson’s Law: any task will inflate until all the available time is spent.

So we have to respect and guide people’s time when they first sign up, by understanding what’s on their mind in that moment.

In Torch’s case

Answering why they were selected, what to expect and what to do next, so they could start with a coach right away.

Next case studyIngenioConversion →